<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the leap from podcast to TV…should you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:01:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I think your last paragraph sums it up perfectly. The problem with TV is as follows.
Do the networks want to keep us.
De we have the sponsors to back the show, which in turn keeps the networks interested.
Are we going to be able to keep up with, and give the viewer what they want. Which points to the 2 above points.

With the Internet setup, you find your own sponsors, you don&#039;t have to worry about a network picking up the show.
You have managed to build a large following already, and really don&#039;t need a network telling you what you need, or have to do, or how long a show need to be to fit into a specified amount of time. If you want to go on vacation tomorrow, you can be free to do it, and still come back with no stress.

TV would be dead if the current TV shows were available on line, and be able to watch on demand. The problem currently is the video quality is generally low grade. Even the major networks that air their shows on the net, still haven&#039;t got it yet. iTunes video format is probably the best available currently, but I don&#039;t want to pay for a commercial free episode. Therefore I don&#039;t mind the commercials.

My point is that as the bandwidth gets better, and more and more quality content comes along, TV as we know it will change big time.

If you look at it. The Cable companies are like sorta like iTunes, but with limited categories. Depending on what you subscribe to, you can get more viewing options.

To me if a network want to air a podcast, or series of podcasts, that puts you in control, and not the other way round.

Best advice is to ask David Marks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your last paragraph sums it up perfectly. The problem with TV is as follows.<br />
Do the networks want to keep us.<br />
De we have the sponsors to back the show, which in turn keeps the networks interested.<br />
Are we going to be able to keep up with, and give the viewer what they want. Which points to the 2 above points.</p>
<p>With the Internet setup, you find your own sponsors, you don&#8217;t have to worry about a network picking up the show.<br />
You have managed to build a large following already, and really don&#8217;t need a network telling you what you need, or have to do, or how long a show need to be to fit into a specified amount of time. If you want to go on vacation tomorrow, you can be free to do it, and still come back with no stress.</p>
<p>TV would be dead if the current TV shows were available on line, and be able to watch on demand. The problem currently is the video quality is generally low grade. Even the major networks that air their shows on the net, still haven&#8217;t got it yet. iTunes video format is probably the best available currently, but I don&#8217;t want to pay for a commercial free episode. Therefore I don&#8217;t mind the commercials.</p>
<p>My point is that as the bandwidth gets better, and more and more quality content comes along, TV as we know it will change big time.</p>
<p>If you look at it. The Cable companies are like sorta like iTunes, but with limited categories. Depending on what you subscribe to, you can get more viewing options.</p>
<p>To me if a network want to air a podcast, or series of podcasts, that puts you in control, and not the other way round.</p>
<p>Best advice is to ask David Marks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Spiegel</title>
		<link>http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Spiegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>You may have long since abandoned this idea, given the age of the post, but…

Thorny question, particularly in the context of a “happy, content life” - classic &#039;old media&#039; vs. &#039;mew media&#039;. There have been some fascinating discussions on this very issue over on the TwIM podcast hosted by Daisy Whitney. You might want to follow her on Twitter if you&#039;re not already.




A critical consideration is how much control you&#039;re willing to give up for incremental market share, what it does to your CPM, and what you can agree is the value to the TV producer (and to you) of making content with high production values, targeted at a focused loyal audience, available to them.

Excepting &#039;Wood Talk Online&#039;, which is reminiscent of a chat with friends sitting around a table with a beer on a Saturday afternoon (Good Thing), yours is essentially visually focused content (just search for anything &#039;woodworking&#039; on audible.com if you doubt that.)

As such, before focusing too heavily on casting a wider (but unfocused) net, and the loss of control that entails, I&#039;d suggest looking for the small investments you can make that would give you the biggest improvements in the production value of your current offering – perhaps a consideration as you rebuild the shop after your recent move.

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have long since abandoned this idea, given the age of the post, but…</p>
<p>Thorny question, particularly in the context of a “happy, content life” &#8211; classic &#8216;old media&#8217; vs. &#8216;mew media&#8217;. There have been some fascinating discussions on this very issue over on the TwIM podcast hosted by Daisy Whitney. You might want to follow her on Twitter if you&#8217;re not already.</p>
<p>A critical consideration is how much control you&#8217;re willing to give up for incremental market share, what it does to your CPM, and what you can agree is the value to the TV producer (and to you) of making content with high production values, targeted at a focused loyal audience, available to them.</p>
<p>Excepting &#8216;Wood Talk Online&#8217;, which is reminiscent of a chat with friends sitting around a table with a beer on a Saturday afternoon (Good Thing), yours is essentially visually focused content (just search for anything &#8216;woodworking&#8217; on audible.com if you doubt that.)</p>
<p>As such, before focusing too heavily on casting a wider (but unfocused) net, and the loss of control that entails, I&#8217;d suggest looking for the small investments you can make that would give you the biggest improvements in the production value of your current offering – perhaps a consideration as you rebuild the shop after your recent move.</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>i think that vodcasts are better for potential international exposure, i&#039;m from australia, and i really enjoy watching you and marc. if you were on some state only station in the US i would have never seen the wood whisperer. every time i watch marc make something i wish i had the space and money to set up some woodworking equipment for myself. i think you would maybe get more female viewers if you did end up making more episodes of everyday how to. 
good luck

elizabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that vodcasts are better for potential international exposure, i&#8217;m from australia, and i really enjoy watching you and marc. if you were on some state only station in the US i would have never seen the wood whisperer. every time i watch marc make something i wish i had the space and money to set up some woodworking equipment for myself. i think you would maybe get more female viewers if you did end up making more episodes of everyday how to.<br />
good luck</p>
<p>elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tibtie</title>
		<link>http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>tibtie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicolespag.com/making-the-leap-from-podcast-to-tv%e2%80%a6should-you/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Great Post Nicole.  Tough question to answer.  I think the internet is going to be up there with tv as far as exposure some day. You guys have some exciting things going on and it is going to be fun following you guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post Nicole.  Tough question to answer.  I think the internet is going to be up there with tv as far as exposure some day. You guys have some exciting things going on and it is going to be fun following you guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
